62 Reasons Why Traditional Catholics don't attend the Novus Ordo

The following are 62 Reasons why, we cannot attend the New Mass wither in the vernacular or the Latin, whether facing the people or facing the tabernacle. Thus, for the same reasons, we adhere faithfully to the traditional Mass:

Because the New Mass is not an unequivocal Profession of Catholic Faith (which the traditional Mass is), it is ambiguous and Protestant. Therefore since we pray as we believe, it follows that we cannot pray with the New mass in Protestant fashion and still believe as Catholics!

Because the changes were not just slight ones but actually “deal with a fundamental renovation…a total change… a new creation.” (Msgr. A. Bugini, co-author of the New Mass.)

Because the New Mass leads us to think “that truths… can be changed or ignored without infidelity to that sacred deposit of doctrine to which the Catholic Faith is bound forever.” **


Because the New Mass represents “a striking departure from the Catholic theology of the Mass as formulated in Session XXII of the Council of Trent” which, in fixing the “canons,” provided an “insurmountable barrier to any heresy against the integrity of the Mystery.” **

Because the difference between the two is not simply one of mere detail or just modification of ceremony, but “all that is of perennial value finds only a minor place (in the New Mass), if it subsists at all.” **

Because “Recent reformers have amply demonstrated that fresh changes in the liturgy could lead to nothing but complete bewilderment in the faithful who already show signs of uneasiness and lessening of faith.”**

Because in times of confusion such as now, we are guided by the words of our Lord: “By their fruits you shall know them.” Fruits of the New Mass are: 30% decrease in Sunday Mass attendance in U.S. (NY times 5/24/75), 43% decreased in France (Cardinal Marty), 50% decrease in Holland (NY Times 1/5/76).

Because “amongst the best of the clergy the practical result (of the New Mass) is an agonizing crisis of conscience…”**

Because in less than seven years after the introduction of the New Mass, priests in the world decreased from 413,438 to 243,307—almost 50% (Holy See Statistics)

Because “The pastoral reasons adduced to support such a grave break with tradition… do not seem to us sufficient.”**

Because the New Mass does not manifest Faith in the Real Presence of our Lord—the traditional Mass manifests it unmistakable
Because the New mass confuses the REAL Presence of Christ in the Eucharist with His MYSTICAL Presence among us (promoting Protestant doctrine).

The New Mass blurs what ought to be a sharp difference between the HIERAEXHIS Priesthood and the common priesthood of the people (as does Protestantism).

The New Mass favors the heretical theory that it is THE FAITH of the people and not THE WORDSOF THE PRIEST, which makes Christ present in the Eucharist.

The insertion of the Lutheran “Prayer of the Faithful” in the New Mass follows and puts forth the protestant Error that all of the people are priests.

The New Mass does away with the Confiteor of the priest, makes it collective with the people, thus promoting Luther’s refusal to accept the Catholic teaching that the priest is judge, witness and intercessor with God

The New Mass gives us to understand that the people concelebrate with the priest—which is against Catholic theology!

Six Protestant ministers collaborated in making up the New Mass (enclosed in this letter is a picture of them together).

Just as Luther did away with the Offertory—since it very clearly expressed the sacrificial, propitiatory character of the Mass—so also the New mass did away with it, reducing it to a simple Preparation of the Gifts.

Enough Catholic theology has been removed that Protestants can, while keeping their antipathy for the true Roman Catholic Church, use the text of the New Mass without difficulty. Protestant Minister Thurian (one of the six Protestant ministers who made up the New Mass) said that a fruit of the New Mass “will perhaps be that the non-Catholic communities will be able to celebrate the Lord’s Supper suing the same prayers as the Catholic Church.” (La Croix 4/30/69).

The narrative manner of the Consecration in the New Mass infers that it is only a memorial and not a true sacrifice (Protestant thesis).

By grave omissions, the New mass leads us to believe that it is only a meal (Protestant doctrine) and not a sacrifice for the remission of sins (Catholic doctrine)

The changes such as: table instead of altar, facing people instead of the tabernacle, Communion in the hand, etc., emphasize Protestant doctrines (e.g. Mass is only a meal, priest only a president of the assembly, etc.).

Protestants themselves have said, “The new Catholic Eucharistic Prayers have abandoned the false perspective of sacrifice offered to God.” (“a Croix 12/10/69).

We are faced with a dilemma: either we became Protestant zed by worshipping with the New Mass, or else we preserve our Catholic “Faith by adhering faithfully to the traditional mass of All Time.

The New Mass was made in accordance with the Protestant definition of the Mass: “The Lord’s Supper or Mass is a sacred synaxis or assembly of the people of God which gathers together under the presidence of the priest to celebrate the memorial of the Lord.” (Par. 7 Introduction to the New Missal, defining the New Mass, 4/6/69).

By means of ambiguity, the New Mass pretends to please Catholics while pleasing Protestants; thus it is “double-tongued” and offensive to God who abhors any kind of hypocrisy: “Cursed be… the double-tongued for they destroy the peace of many.” (Sirach 28:13).

Because beautiful and familiar catholic hymns which have inspired people for centuries, have been thrown out and replaced with new hymns strongly Protestant in sentiment (i.e. “Amazing Grace”, “How Great thou Art”, etc.,), and we now sing songs that are of a secular origin (i.e. “Morning has Broken”, etc., etc.). This further deepens the already distinct impression that one is no longer attending a Catholic Mass.

The New Mass contains ambiguities subtly favoring heresy, which is more dangerous that if it were clearly heretical since a half-heresy half resembles the truth!

Because Christ has only Spouse, the Catholic Church, and her worship service cannot also serve religions that are at enmity with her

The New Mass follows the format of Cranmer’s heretical Anglican Mass, and the methods used to promote it follow precisely the methods of the English heretics.

Because the Church has canonized numerous English martyrs who were killed because they refused to participate at a Mass such as the New Mass!

Because Protestants who once converted to Catholicism are scandalized to see that the New Mass is the same as the one they attended as Protestants.

Statistics show a great decreases in conversions to Catholicism following use of the New Mass. Conversions, which were in the 100,000 range a year in the U.S., have decreased to less than 10,000!

The Traditional Mass has forged many saints. “Innumerable saints have been fed abundantly with the proper piety towards God by it (the Latin Mass)…” (Pope Paul VI, Const. Apost. Missale Romanum)

Because the nature of the New Mass is such as to facilitate profanations of the Hoy Eucharist, which occur with a frequency unheard of with the traditional Mass.

The New Mass, despite appearances, convey a New Faith, not the Catholic Faith. It conveys Modernism and follows EXACTLY the tactics of Modernism, using vague terminology in order to insinuate and advance Error.

By introducing optional variations, the New Mass undermines the unity of the liturgy, with each priest liable to deviate as he fancies under the guise of creativity. Disorder inevitably results, accompanied by lack of respect & by irreverence.

Because many good Catholic theologians, canonists and priests do not accept the New Mass and affirm that they are unable to celebrate it in good conscience.

The New Mass has eliminated such things as: genuflections (only three remain), purification of the priest’s fingers in the chalice, preservation from all profane contact of priest’s fingers after the Consecration, sacred altar stone and relics, three altar cloths (reduced to one), all of which “only serve to emphasize how outrageously fiaht in the dogma of the Real Presence is implicitly repudiated.”**

Because the traditional Mass, enriched and mastered by centuries of Sacred Tradition, was codified (not invented!) by Saint Pope Pius V; whereas the New Mass was artificially fabricated.

Because the Errors of the New Mass which are accentuated in the vernacular version are even present in the Latin text of the New Mass.

Because the New Mass, with its ambiguity and permissiveness, exposes us to the wrath of God by facilitating the risk of invalid celebrations. “Will priests of the near future who have not received the traditional formation, and who rely on the Novus Ordo with the intention of ‘doing what the Church does,’ consecrate validly? One may be allowed to doubt it.”**

Because the abolition of the traditional Mass recalls the prophecy of Daniel 8:12: “And he was given power against the perpetual sacrifice because of the sins of the people” and the observation of St. Alphonsus de Liguori that because the Mass is the best and most beautiful thing which exists in the Church here below, the devil has always tried by means of heretics to deprive us of it.

Because in places where the traditional Mass is preserved, the faith and fervor of the people are greater whereas the opposite is true where the New Mass reigns. (Report on the Mass, Diocese of Campos, ROMA, Buenos Aires #69, 8/81)

Because along with the New Mass goes also a new catechism, a new morality, new prayers, new ideas, a new calendar—in one word, a New church, a complete revolution from the old. “The liturgical reform… do not be deceived, this is where the revolution begins.” (Msgr. Dwyer, Archbishop of Birmingham, spokesman of Episcopal Synod.).

Because the intrinsic beauty of the traditional Mass attracts souls by itself; whereas the New Mass, lacking any attractiveness of its own, has to invent novelties and entertainments in order to appeal to people.

Because the New Mass embodies numerous errors condemned dogmatically at the council of Trent (Mass totally in vernacular, words of Consecration spoken aloud, etc. See Coadunation of Jansenist Synod of Pistoia), and errors condemned by Pope Pius XIII (e.g. altar in form of a table. See Mediator Dei).

Because the New mass attempts to transform the Catholic Church into a new, ecumenical church embracing all ideologies and all religions—right and wrong, truth and error—a goal long dreamt by the enemies of the Catholic Church.

Because the New Mass, in removing the salutations and final blessing when the priest celebrates alone, shows a disbelief in the dogma of the Communion of Saints.

Because the altar and tabernacle are now separated, thus marking a division between Christ in His priest-and-Sacrifice-on-the-altar, from Christ in His Real Presence in the tabernacle, “tow things which of their very nature, must remain together.” (Pope Pius XII)

Because the New Mass no longer constitutes a vertical worship from man to God, but instead a horizontal worship between man and man.

Because the New Mass, although appearing to conform to the dispositions of Vatican Council II, in reality opposes its instructions, since the Council declared its desire to conserve and promote its traditional rite.

Because the traditional Latin Mass of Pope St. Pius V has never been legally abrogated and therefore remains a true rite of the Catholic Church by which Catholics may fulfill their Sunday obligation

Because Pope St. Pius V granted a perpetual indult, valid “for always,” to celebrate the traditional Mass freely, licitly, without scruple of conscience, punishment, sentence or censure (Papal Bull “Quo Primum”).

Because Pope Paul VI, when promulgating the New Mass, himself declared, “The rite… by itself is NOT a dogmatic definition…” (11/19/69)

Because Pope Paul VI, when asked by Cardinal Heenan of England, if he was abrogating or prohibiting the Tridentine Mass, answered: “It is not my intention to prohibit absolutely the Tridentine Mass.”

Because “In the Libera Nos of the New Mass, the Blessed Virgin, the Apostles and all the Saints are no longer mentioned; her and their intercession thus no longer asked even in time of peril.”**

Because in none of the three (now five) new Eucharistic Prayers (of the New Mass) is there any reference… to the state of suffering of those who have died, in none the possibility of a particular memento, thus underling faith in the redemptive nature of the Sacrifice.**

Because, although we recognize the Holy Father’s supreme authority in his universal government of the Church, but we know that when this authority cannot impose upon us a practice which is equivocal and favoring heresy and therefore disagreeable to God.

Because, as stated in Vatican Council I, the “Holy Spirit was not promised to the successors of Peter, that by His revelation they might make new doctrine, but that by His assistance they might inviolable keep and faithfully expound the revelation or desposity of faith relieved through the Apostles.” (D.S. 3070).

And finally, heresy, or whatever clearly favors heresy cannot be matter for obedience. Obedience is at the service of Faith and not Faith at the service of obedience! In this foregoing case then, one must obey God before men”. (Acts of the Apostles 5:29).

-----------------------------------------------

I hand-typed these from a pamphlet, so if one notices any typos, please let me know.

God Bless.